4    The Public Meaning of Heritage


 

 

 

 

Grand Tetons, Wyoming

 


 

 

“There is further tension between national and local heritage.  National heritage leans toward more homogeneous versions of heritage.  Celebrations of local identity, on the other hand,…tend toward creating heterogeneous heritage.”

-Barbara Little, 2002

 


 

 

Frederick Douglass

 

 

National Heritage & National Parks

 

The various lands, historic sites, battlefields, and monuments in the National Park System were selected over a long period of time on the basis of their reflection of our national history and character. Undoubtedly, the history of our national parks reflects the history of our changing cultural views of our national past.

 

Yellowstone and Yosemite are significant not only as examples of stunning natural scenery but also as testimony to a particular time in our young nation’s history. The majesty of the rugged mountains was seen to rival the great cathedrals of Europe as national icons and contributed to a sense of national pride. Westward expansion also led to concern over the potential destruction of this grand scenery, resulting eventually in the creation of our national park system. Thus, these and other parks are important not only for their natural resources but also as significant aspects of our cultural heritage.

 

While no list could ever be considered exhaustive, several major types of resources comprise our national heritage. These include

 

 Natural and cultural resources

 Ethnographic resources 

 Built resources

 Archeological resources

 Landscape features, including designed landscapes, cultural landscapes, forest reserves, and wildlife

 

In addition to their national significance, many heritage resources also are important at the local or regional level.

 

 

Local and Regional Heritage

 

Local and regional significance does not supplant the national importance

of our natural and cultural resources but, instead, helps explain more fully our

nation’s history. The increasingly sophisticated and educated public is often

wary of interpretation through broad brush strokes that gloss over details of historical events. Singular and personal details that describe important

historical figures and sites in human terms can provide visitors with greater opportunities to make intellectual and emotional connections to the

resource—that is, history that is relevant to their lives.

 

 

“First-Person” Heritage

 

“First person” accounts, such as those derived from oral histories, personal diaries, and other tangible lines of evidence, often provide ways for visitors to make intellectual and emotional connections to cultural resources. Such accounts speak of a person, place, or thing more directly and specifically than broad themes of national political and military history, two common themes in many efforts to interpret our national history. Archeology can often provide important “first person” lines of evidence, particularly in the form of artifacts, such as personal effects, that are unearthed during excavations at historic houses, battlefields, and other sites. Such items allow the public to make intellectual and emotional connections to the story being told about real individuals, not just historic events.

 

←   Back  

 Next    →

 
CHRS home

An Inspiring Guide

I. Introduction

II. Overview of the Program

III. Meeting the Mission

IV. The Public Meaning of Archeological Heritage

V. Archeology and Interpretation

VI. Study Tour of Parks

VII. Interpretive Products

VIII. Credits

IX. References

X. Resources and Links

 

National Park Service  - Archeology and Ethnography Program  - Distance Learning

 training home